Comments on: Things that NAT breaks http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2007/12/02/things-that-nat-breaks/ Thoughts and musings Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:25:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dan Siemon http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2007/12/02/things-that-nat-breaks/comment-page-1/#comment-384770 Dan Siemon Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:07:38 +0000 http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2007/12/02/things-that-nat-breaks/#comment-384770 NANOG archives have moved. You can now find the NANOG thread at http://www.nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/2007-06/msg00010.html NANOG archives have moved. You can now find the NANOG thread at http://www.nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/2007-06/msg00010.html

]]> By: codingfreak http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2007/12/02/things-that-nat-breaks/comment-page-1/#comment-383975 codingfreak Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:39:12 +0000 http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2007/12/02/things-that-nat-breaks/#comment-383975 All the Links are down All the Links are down

]]> By: cobolhacker http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2007/12/02/things-that-nat-breaks/comment-page-1/#comment-155857 cobolhacker Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:47:34 +0000 http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2007/12/02/things-that-nat-breaks/#comment-155857 I think a lot of people conflate NATs with firewalls because they are often used together. However, NAT is necessary, because ISPs charge extra money for IPs that the end users don't want to pay for. I think a lot of people conflate NATs with firewalls because they are often used together.

However, NAT is necessary, because ISPs charge extra money for IPs that the end users don’t want to pay for.

]]>