<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNS query UDP source port graphs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2008/07/26/dns-query-udp-source-port-graphs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2008/07/26/dns-query-udp-source-port-graphs/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2008/07/26/dns-query-udp-source-port-graphs/comment-page-1/#comment-234589</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=326#comment-234589</guid>
		<description>The graphs were created with Python and the following libraries:
matplotlib - http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/
dpkt - http://code.google.com/p/dpkt/
pypcap - http://code.google.com/p/pypcap/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The graphs were created with Python and the following libraries:<br />
matplotlib &#8211; <a href="http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/</a><br />
dpkt &#8211; <a href="http://code.google.com/p/dpkt/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/dpkt/</a><br />
pypcap &#8211; <a href="http://code.google.com/p/pypcap/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/pypcap/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theetabond</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2008/07/26/dns-query-udp-source-port-graphs/comment-page-1/#comment-234484</link>
		<dc:creator>theetabond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=326#comment-234484</guid>
		<description>Hey...just interested in how you generated these graphs...i&#039;ve got some PCAP files and i want to generate good looking graphs on the bandwidth utilisation of link.

Any hints pls?

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8230;just interested in how you generated these graphs&#8230;i&#8217;ve got some PCAP files and i want to generate good looking graphs on the bandwidth utilisation of link.</p>
<p>Any hints pls?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Siemon &#187; More fun with DNS packet captures</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2008/07/26/dns-query-udp-source-port-graphs/comment-page-1/#comment-224991</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Siemon &#187; More fun with DNS packet captures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=326#comment-224991</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments Dan Siemon on DNS query UDP source port graphscobolhacker on Chicago (U-505)cobolhacker on Gin and the cognitive surplusDan Siemon on Gin and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments Dan Siemon on DNS query UDP source port graphscobolhacker on Chicago (U-505)cobolhacker on Gin and the cognitive surplusDan Siemon on Gin and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2008/07/26/dns-query-udp-source-port-graphs/comment-page-1/#comment-223884</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=326#comment-223884</guid>
		<description>One extra note: when talking about the banding I was referring to the vertical banding. The horizontal band is also interesting. Does it indicate a slight preference for that port? I am grabbing another capture now to see if this behaviour still exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One extra note: when talking about the banding I was referring to the vertical banding. The horizontal band is also interesting. Does it indicate a slight preference for that port? I am grabbing another capture now to see if this behaviour still exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
