<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Create your own economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2009/08/30/create-your-own-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2009/08/30/create-your-own-economy/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobolhacker</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2009/08/30/create-your-own-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-289412</link>
		<dc:creator>cobolhacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=648#comment-289412</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t read the book so YMMV.

One thing I might posit, though I&#039;d probably need a whole book to prove it, is that technologies like texting, instant messenging and facebook-like sites, while fantastic ways of delivering incremental bits of information, do little to actually bring people closer together.

Texting, for example, is a fantastic way to communicate to someone without actually speaking to them.  It is inherently a very limited and mostly non-interactive method of communication.  Now, maybe you have a reason for not just calling them, but a lot of those reasons are sort of negative, eg. don&#039;t want to chat right now, don&#039;t have the time, person talks forever, I just want to tell them this one thing, etc... A lot of the reasons for narrowing personal communications bandwidth have nothing to do with increasing the quality of a relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t read the book so YMMV.</p>
<p>One thing I might posit, though I&#8217;d probably need a whole book to prove it, is that technologies like texting, instant messenging and facebook-like sites, while fantastic ways of delivering incremental bits of information, do little to actually bring people closer together.</p>
<p>Texting, for example, is a fantastic way to communicate to someone without actually speaking to them.  It is inherently a very limited and mostly non-interactive method of communication.  Now, maybe you have a reason for not just calling them, but a lot of those reasons are sort of negative, eg. don&#8217;t want to chat right now, don&#8217;t have the time, person talks forever, I just want to tell them this one thing, etc&#8230; A lot of the reasons for narrowing personal communications bandwidth have nothing to do with increasing the quality of a relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

