<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux x86_64 and Javascript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2010/03/29/linux-x86_64-and-javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2010/03/29/linux-x86_64-and-javascript/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobolhacker</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2010/03/29/linux-x86_64-and-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-316786</link>
		<dc:creator>cobolhacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=686#comment-316786</guid>
		<description>There are going to be a lot more 64-bit Windows users in the future, I suspect.  A lot of people I know who are getting Windows 7 seem to be opting for the 64-bit version.  Unlike Vista, driver support for it seems fairly decent.  I imagine a 64-bit JIT is on it&#039;s way, tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are going to be a lot more 64-bit Windows users in the future, I suspect.  A lot of people I know who are getting Windows 7 seem to be opting for the 64-bit version.  Unlike Vista, driver support for it seems fairly decent.  I imagine a 64-bit JIT is on it&#8217;s way, tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

