<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dan Siemon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coverfire.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coverfire.com</link>
	<description>Things that interest me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 02:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux QoS Library (LQL) Released by LQL Update &#124; Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2004/08/31/linux-qos-library-lql-released/comment-page-1/#comment-451381</link>
		<dc:creator>LQL Update &#124; Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 02:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2004/08/31/linux-qos-library-lql-released/#comment-451381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] first release of the Linux QoS Library (LQL) which was on August 31st has been well received. LQL 0.5.0 has been [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first release of the Linux QoS Library (LQL) which was on August 31st has been well received. LQL 0.5.0 has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CBC and Internet streaming by Francis Cordell</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2004/09/10/cbc-and-internet-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-450993</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Cordell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2004/09/10/cbc-and-internet-streaming/#comment-450993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sirs:
I am using RealPlayer to receive CBC News Audio. For some reason the stream is not updating from day to day / hour to hour? 

Sadly I received no reply from you on several prior inquires Beginning on 20 March 2013.

Please Help me correct this problem.
Thanks, Francis Cordell]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sirs:<br />
I am using RealPlayer to receive CBC News Audio. For some reason the stream is not updating from day to day / hour to hour? </p>
<p>Sadly I received no reply from you on several prior inquires Beginning on 20 March 2013.</p>
<p>Please Help me correct this problem.<br />
Thanks, Francis Cordell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Queueing by Grandpa Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2004/09/10/queueing/comment-page-1/#comment-443498</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandpa Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2004/09/10/queueing/#comment-443498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Queuing and queueing both appear to be correct spellings that may differ with locale, though my spellchecker just informed me that the latter is incorrect.  Variant spellings of words in England, Canada, Australia, and the United States should not be considered wrong, but simply different.  The spelling of English words in England has been evolving for centuries, and the modern words are not considered to be spelled incorrectly because they deviate from the original spellings.  The comments toward &#039;American&#039; spelling of words appear to be simply biased opinions by the writers.  Colour and honour look equally odd to me, but I do not ridicule the spellings (spellchecker just informed me that these are also spelled incorrectly).  May we please move forward past historical differences and learn to accept each other.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Queuing and queueing both appear to be correct spellings that may differ with locale, though my spellchecker just informed me that the latter is incorrect.  Variant spellings of words in England, Canada, Australia, and the United States should not be considered wrong, but simply different.  The spelling of English words in England has been evolving for centuries, and the modern words are not considered to be spelled incorrectly because they deviate from the original spellings.  The comments toward &#8216;American&#8217; spelling of words appear to be simply biased opinions by the writers.  Colour and honour look equally odd to me, but I do not ridicule the spellings (spellchecker just informed me that these are also spelled incorrectly).  May we please move forward past historical differences and learn to accept each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Network latency experiments by Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2011/02/21/network-latency-experiments/comment-page-1/#comment-437606</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=865#comment-437606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s been a long time but I finally got around to presenting some results for the tc configuration I mention at the end of this post.

https://www.coverfire.com/archives/2013/01/01/improving-my-home-internet-performance/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long time but I finally got around to presenting some results for the tc configuration I mention at the end of this post.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.coverfire.com/archives/2013/01/01/improving-my-home-internet-performance/" rel="nofollow">https://www.coverfire.com/archives/2013/01/01/improving-my-home-internet-performance/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Per packet overhead on VDSL2 &#8211; part 2 by Per packet overhead on VDSL2 &#8211; 3 &#124; Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2012/12/04/per-packet-overhead-on-vdsl2-2/comment-page-1/#comment-432927</link>
		<dc:creator>Per packet overhead on VDSL2 &#8211; 3 &#124; Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 04:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coverfire.com/?p=1649#comment-432927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Per packet overhead on VDSL2 &#8211; 2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Per packet overhead on VDSL2 &#8211; 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Per packet overhead on VDSL2 by Per packet overhead on VDSL &#8211; 3 &#124; Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2012/11/29/per-packet-overhead-on-vdsl2/comment-page-1/#comment-432925</link>
		<dc:creator>Per packet overhead on VDSL &#8211; 3 &#124; Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 03:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coverfire.com/?p=1622#comment-432925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Per packet overhead on VDSL [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Per packet overhead on VDSL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Per packet overhead on VDSL2 by Per packet overhead on VDSL2 &#8211; 2 &#124; Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2012/11/29/per-packet-overhead-on-vdsl2/comment-page-1/#comment-432581</link>
		<dc:creator>Per packet overhead on VDSL2 &#8211; 2 &#124; Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coverfire.com/?p=1622#comment-432581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] few days ago I wrote about some interesting latency results I observed on my home Internet connection with small packets. This post adds a bit more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days ago I wrote about some interesting latency results I observed on my home Internet connection with small packets. This post adds a bit more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another good Codel/Bufferbloat talk by Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2012/09/13/another-good-codelbufferbloat-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-419029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=1492#comment-419029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, fixed :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, fixed :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another good Codel/Bufferbloat talk by dave taht</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/archives/2012/09/13/another-good-codelbufferbloat-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-418252</link>
		<dc:creator>dave taht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/?p=1492#comment-418252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The curse of my existence  is the modern spell checker. There seems to be a ongoing, global, algorithmic, ongoing to erase my famiy name from existence.

(thx for the link, tho. ;) )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curse of my existence  is the modern spell checker. There seems to be a ongoing, global, algorithmic, ongoing to erase my famiy name from existence.</p>
<p>(thx for the link, tho. ;) )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ping-exp by Dan Siemon</title>
		<link>http://www.coverfire.com/projects/ping-exp/comment-page-1/#comment-415442</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Siemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coverfire.com/#comment-415442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, no. It only knows how to call the ping command not ping6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, no. It only knows how to call the ping command not ping6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
