Meltdown and Spectre provide more evidence, if it really is needed, that continuing to run old, out-of-date kernels is a terrifically risky thing to do.
An update on XDP and CPUMap.
Very interesting. The key is that eBPF programs can be attached to tracepoints.
Coming soon to a 4.11 kernel near you, eBPF maps that can do longest prefix matches for things like IP routing.
There is a lot happening on the XDP front in the Linux kernel these days. This presentation provides a good overview.
I love the idea that eBPF is becoming a policy language for the kernel.
As always, KernelNewbies is the place to go for a great summary of new kernel features. Here’s some 4.10 highlights I’m interested in.
BPF for lightweight tunnel encapsulation commit, https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/f74599f7c5309b21151233b98139e9b723fd1110
TCP: sender chronographs instrumentation. This feature exports the sender chronograph stats via the socket SO_TIMESTAMPING channel. Currently it can instrument how long a particular application unit of data was queued in TCP by tracking SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SCHED. Having these sender chronograph stats exported simultaneously along with these timestamps allow further breaking down the various sender limitation. For example, a video server can tell if a particular chunk of video on a connection takes a long time to deliver because TCP was experiencing small receive window commit, commit, commit, commit, commit, commit
sched/act_mirred: Implement the corresponding ingress actions TCA_INGRESS_REDIR and TCA_INGRESS_MIRROR (Up until now, action mirred supported only egress actions (either TCA_EGRESS_REDIR or TCA_EGRESS_MIRROR). This allows attaching filters whose target is to hand matching skbs into the rx processing of a specified device commit, commit, commit, commit
Since the dawn of time, the way Linux synchronizes to disk the data written to memory by processes (aka. background writeback) has sucked. When Linux writes all that data in the background, it should have little impact on foreground activity. That’s the definition of background activity…But for a long as it can be remembered, heavy buffered writers have not behaved like that. For instance, if you do something like $ dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1M count=10k, or try to copy files to USB storage, and then try and start a browser or any other large app, it basically won’t start before the buffered writeback is done, and your desktop, or command shell, feels unreponsive. These problems happen because heavy writes -the kind of write activity caused by the background writeback- fill up the block layer, and other IO requests have to wait a lot to be attended (for more details, see the LWN article).
This release adds a mechanism that throttles back buffered writeback, which makes more difficult for heavy writers to monopolize the IO requests queue, and thus provides a smoother experience in Linux desktops and shells than what people was used to. The algorithm for when to throttle can monitor the latencies of requests, and shrinks or grows the request queue depth accordingly, which means that it’s auto-tunable, and generally, a user would not have to touch the settings. This feature needs to be enabled explicitly in the configuration (and, as it should be expected, there can be regressions)
Recommended LWN article: Toward less-annoying background writeback
Recently, I’ve done some work with eBPF and specifically the in-kernel maps that are manipulated and shared by both kernel and user space code.
When doing this I ran into permission errors when installing large maps. It took a little while to figure out that the cause of this was the root user’s locked memory limit being too low (thanks Daniel Borkmann).
The locked memory limit is modified with ulimit:
ulimit -l unlimited
I’ve had a Dell XPS 9550 since around February. It’s a fantastic laptop but there definitely have been teething pains with the Skylake processor and Linux, specifically related to power management.
Today I installed Linux kernel 4.8-rc5 and got a nice surprise vs 4.7.2 which I was running.
That’s quite a bit better than observed with 4.7.2 and far, far better than 4.5.X when I first got the laptop.